We Must Have the Right to Choose Euthanasia :: Free Euthanasia Essay

We Must Have the Right to get Euthanasia           There are many sides to the dilemma of whether or not euthanasia should be carried out.  There is the question of morality, the question of alert versus supine euthanasia and the question of when euthanasia should be put into use.  N genius of these questions are totally cut and dry.  There seem to be more gray-headed areas within this issue than there are black and white.    Yet when you tactile sensation at the problem on a personal level with the positive individuals involved, some of those gray areas almost disappear.  People are put on this earth to live.  When it gets to the point where the quality of a persons spirit gets so mentally ill that they can no longer function in the world, there is no reason to force that person to stay alive.  Euthanasia is therefore a  necessary evil for those whose practical life is in effect over due to a t erminal illness or otherwise life devastating condition.           If a person is in unbearable pain and conterminous to death or is in a vegetable state and no longer able to function, their life is by all practical direction over.  There is no reason to keep them alive.  The only focal point to cobblers last their physical life is by euthanasia.  The question is whether to do this by way of active euthanasia or passive euthanasia.  Many are against active euthanasia because in this case you actually kill the person alternatively than letting them die.  But both methods are used for the same halt which is to end someones life without further pain for the long-suffering as tumefy as for the family.  The only choice to make after this fact is realised is which of these means better carries out the end. James Rachels, a philosophy professor, says that, if one simply withholds treatment in the way of passive euthan asia, it may take the patient longer to die, and so he may suffer more than he would if more direct action were taken and a lethal gibe given. (Rachels, p.111)  This defeats the purpose of euthanasia which is to end suffering.  Therefore, in cases where euthanasia is going to be carried out, active euthanasia is the better choice.