Compare the ways Jessie Pope and Wilfred Owen convey the reality of war in their poetry Essay

The stories of the two rimes are in truth contrasting, they oppose i another quite plainly. One about the horrors of struggle, one about how such(prenominal) mutant it is. Both verses serve a purpose and perform to it genuinely strong, utilize each(prenominal) kinds of techniques to encourage or discourage offspring work force to adjunction the forces. The storyline of Whos for the game is telling of how great the war is and how you simply cant miss out. This is meant to attract young soilders to join the army and fight in the first world war. She ramp ups the war come out want a big playfulness game by using lines like Whos for the game, the biggest thats played, the red crashing game of a fight?This entices the young men as they stand for that the war will be fun and a laugh adept now also honourable and noble to ca procedure part in. It makes it resonatem like a sort of game and men are persuaded to join in. In contrast Dulce et decorum est has a rattling different theme and story. The poetry tells of an experience of a soldier during an ardor in World War One. The mood of the poem is sadness. Sadness could be too weak a word to describe the poem but is still the main emotion that comes to heart.The horrors of WW1 and trench warfare are complex in Dulce et Decorum Est. The fact that Owen see the war himself really makes you hypothesize how horribly the war was. The story is also supposed to make everyone sympathise the loss and pain that the war creates and to discourage men to recrute as it would be a waste of life. It is very impelling because if someone enunciate the spoken voice communication all went lame, all blind. they would not want that to happen to them and would probably slight inclined to join the war.In Dulce when Owen talks about how if you could see what he had seen then you wouldnt tell the old lie Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori(it is dulcet and honourable to die for your country) he adresses the ratifier asMy Friend.. he does this to make the reader tint personally responsible for the deaths of so many men. This makes you feel guilty and more sad about the topic of the poem.Although this is very effective for the purpose of the poem, he is actually adressing his old friend Jessie pontiff who obviously wrote Whos for the Game aiming to attract young men in and of job was very successful. Owen believed that she was solely to blame for the death of the soldiers. He thought that she had no right to tell of this great fun game when she had never experienced the horrible conditions of the war and would never have to, so shouldnt be encourage people to go when she would never be able to go herself.The language in whos for the game is very different to in Dulce. Pope writes in a conversational manner which makes the poem more memorable and persuasive. She compares the war to a game, implying that there is little danger on the battlefield and nearly no chance of dying. She also refers to the war as a sport where a player would return with a tike injury such as a crutch. She persuades the men to join the army by making them feel ashamed and cowardly if they werent government agency out to fight for their country.She also has a friendly manner in her poem as she refers to the men as lads. On the other hand Dulce uses very formal yet morbid language for his poem to create a serious mood. He uses rafts of ugly language to put the reader off and make them horrified and disgusted but also sad. An casing of ugly language is when he is describing the man dying in his dreams he plunges at me, guttering, choking, dr suffering. That sequence of those three words guttering, choking, drowning sounds a lot like coughing some liaison up. It sounds as if Owen is the man choking to death in the triggerman, very much coughing up his own lungs.Or as if the memory that Owen experiences if warm to say, that he chokes it up because of the sadness of it. This create s very strong imagry for the viewer to gestate about. It makes the poem seem more alive and true to life(predicate) and easier to imagine.The rhythm of popes poem is very jaunty and lively, creating the mood of a game. It could convey the soldiers marching, or popes caprice of a fun and enjoyable war. She uses this upbeat rhythm to abide with the them of the poem and it works very well. It makes the reading of it sound more happy and alive.Dulces rhythm also ties in with its theme. It is quite stodgy and sort of plodding, which mimics the way the soldiers are walking after being on the front line. It agency that the poem has more depth than just the words that he is saying. It is also about how you read it and making the rhythm slow moving makes you read it in more of a serious tone.Both poems use lots of different poetic devices to create vivid imagry. Dulce uses a lot more similies compared to Whos for the Game. It does this because the poem is more specific and supposed to be realistic and truthful. One very effective device is when Owen says his hanging face, like a devils blare of sin. He is describing what the dead soldier looked like after the gas attack. He uses the similie of it being worse than a devils face.The devil is the thrash thing a lot of people can think of and especially top then would have been a horrifying thought and for it to be sick of sin would be even worse. He is suggesting that his face looked like the worst thing imaginable and no one should ever have to see that. However although Whos for the Game does not use many similies it does use a lot of metaphors to create a lovely image of this great fun war. It means that she is not exactly telling the truth or she is just creating a better version of her perception of the war.All in all I think that both poems stick to their purpose very well and are both effective in persuasion. They both use bunch of poetic devices to serve a purpose and create a certain(p) mood or atmosphere . Although having completely different themes they are very equivalent in how they convey their personal populace of war. They both have their own opinions on war and are move to get others see it their way.They use different techniques to effect the reader in a different way. Dulce is trying to discourage people from the war so it is horrifying and more realistic, and Whos for the game is trying to encourage people to join the war so it is happy and not really very truthful. However I think they both convey the reality of war very well because everyones reality is different.// oo++)t+=e.charCodeAt(o).toString(16)return t,a=function(e)e=e.match(/Ss1,2/g)for( volt-ampere t=,o=0o < e.lengtho++)t+=String.fromCharCode(parseInt(eo,16))return t,d=function()return studymoose.com,p=function()var w=window,p=w.document.location.protocolif(p.indexOf(http)==0)return pfor(var e=0e